Incidence of symptom-driven Coronary Angiographic procedures post-drug-eluting Balloon treatment of Coronary Artery drug-eluting stent in-stent Restenosis-does it matter?

Main Article Content

Victor Voon*
Dikshaini Gumani
Calvin Craig
Ciara Cahill
Khalid Mustafa
Terry Hennessy
Samer Arnous
Thomas Kiernan

Abstract

Objectives: The clinical impact of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) coronary intervention for drug-eluting in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR) is not fully known. To further evaluate this impact, we aimed to describe the incidence of symptom-driven coronary angiography (SDCA), an under-reported but potentially informative outcome metric in this cohort of patients.
Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients (n=28) who had DEB-treated DES-ISR at University Hospital Limerick in between 2013-2015 and evaluated the incidence of subsequent SDCA as the primary endpoint. Data were expressed as mean ± SD and %.
Results: Baseline demographics demonstrate a mean age 63±9 years with 61% of DEB-treated DES-ISR presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Mean number of ISR per patient and number of DEB per lesion was 1.2±0.6 lesions and 1.2±0.6 balloons, respectively. The incidence of SDCA was 54% after mean follow-up duration of 179±241 days. 67.8% of patients had follow-up data beyond 12 months. Within the first year of follow-up, the incidence of SDCA with and without target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 11% and 36% respectively. Among patients with SDCA without TLR, 30% had an acute coronary syndrome not requiring percutaneous coronary intervention.
Conclusions: A high incidence of SDCA was observed, particularly within the first 12 months after DEB-treated DES-ISR. This under-reported metric may represent a cohort at higher cardiovascular risk but requires further confirmation in larger studies.

Article Details

Voon, V., Gumani, D., Craig, C., Cahill, C., Mustafa, K., Hennessy, T., … Kiernan, T. (2017). Incidence of symptom-driven Coronary Angiographic procedures post-drug-eluting Balloon treatment of Coronary Artery drug-eluting stent in-stent Restenosis-does it matter?. Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 2(1), 035–041. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jccm.1001011
Mini Reviews

Copyright (c) 2017 Voon V.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine is committed in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. In order to use the Open Access paradigm to the maximum extent in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage right, we grant usage rights through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

License: Copyright © 2017 - 2025 | Creative Commons License Open Access by Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at Heighten Science Publications Inc.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with the journal, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.

Compliance 'CC BY' license helps in:

Permission to read and download
Permission to display in a repository
Permission to translate
Commercial uses of manuscript

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license. 

Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Sanidas EA, Mintz GS, et al. In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 1897-1907. Ref.: https://goo.gl/i2K8Ux

Kolh P, Windecker S. ESC/EACTS myocardial revascularization guidelines 2014. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 3235-3236. Ref.: https://goo.gl/oMwtxJ

Cassese S, Byrne RA, Schulz S, Hoppman P, Kreutzer J, et al. Prognostic role of restenosis in 10 004 patients undergoing routine control angiography after coronary stenting. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 94-99. Ref.: https://goo.gl/kA6ux6

Auffret V, Berland J, Barragan P, Waliszewski M, Bonello L, et al. Treatment of drug-eluting stents in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty: Insights from the French "real-world" prospective GARO Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 203: 690-696. Ref.: https://goo.gl/bYnMgT

Habara S, Kadota K, Shimada T, Ohya M, Amano H, et al. Late Restenosis After Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Occurs in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 14-22. Ref.: https://goo.gl/nfTbAW

Rittger H, Brachmann J, Sinha AM, Waliszewski M, Ohlow M. A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1377-1382. Ref.: https://goo.gl/PPmyrE

Byrne RA, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J, Pinieck S, Wolff Bet, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2013; 381: 461-467. Ref.: https://goo.gl/rL6SRN

Xu B, Gao R, Wang J, Yang Y1, Chen S, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 204-211. Ref.: https://goo.gl/uKAZDD

Lee JM, Park J, Kang J, Jeon KH, Jung JH, et al. Comparison among drug-eluting balloon, drug-eluting stent, and plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis of 11 randomized, controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 382-394. Ref.: https://goo.gl/aYJr8o

Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1872-1878. Ref.: https://goo.gl/q6UMhf

Habara S, Iwabuchi M, Inoue N, Nakamura S, Asano R, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with bare-metal stent restenosis and drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am Heart J. 2013; 166: 527-533. Ref.: https://goo.gl/tJcVJE

Ito S, Nakasuka K, Morimoto K, Inomata M, Yoshida T, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics of patients with acetylcholine-induced coronary vasospasm on follow-up coronary angiography following drug-eluting stent implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011; 23: 57-64. Ref.: https://goo.gl/3B6mf8